¶ … Feminism and colonialism
Gayatri Spivak's essay "Can the subaltern speak?" is a complex and sometimes elliptical essay which can be summed up in a very simple answer: "no." Spivak poignantly illustrates the reality of many Indian women's lives throughout history by providing an overview of how the treatment of native women was regarded during the period of Indian colonial rule. The British, in their effort to present themselves as civilizing the uncouth and barbarian Indians, decried what they saw as negative, male-dominant aspects of Indian culture. Many Indian men defended this ideology as a source of national cultural pride and as a source of resistance to colonialism. Of course, the voices of the women were lost in this discourse: to speak out against patriarchy meant to ally themselves with the British who did not have their interests or their country's interests at heart. To condone Indian patriarchy meant to sublimate their own interests as women. "Both as an object of colonialist historiography and as a subject of insurgency, the ideological structure keeps the male dominant" (Spivak 28). There was no ideological place to articulate their needs.
Edward Said, however, would add that not only actual women are deemed feminine and therefore worthy of oppression but that the entire 'Orient' itself has been constructed as feminine in colonial discourse and therefore worthy of being oppressed (however Spivak might counter that this might be one reason...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now